Visit the NZ Transport Agency website
www.nzta.govt.nz
Print version: Inspecting vehicles for clearly visible smoke (PDF, 120 KB, 2 pages)
Please refer to the inspection requirements in Vehicle Inspection Requirements Manual: In-service
Certification. Exhaust: 11-2 Visible smoke.
The requirement is based on Land Transport Rule: Vehicle Exhaust Emissions 2006. The aim of this
rule is to check that vehicles are not gross polluters. A Ministry of Transport study in 2006 estimated
that 1-2% of petrol-powered vehicles may be affected by this test. The number of diesel vehicles
affected may be higher.
Below is some guidance on how to conduct the test as well as assistance in assessing whether
any smoke emissions will cause the vehicle to pass or fail. A re-inspection is an unannounced
non-chargeable re-inspection of
specific items on a vehicle that
has recently been inspected by an
Inspecting Organisation.
The following test may be performed with the engine below normal operating temperature. If the Vehicle fails the test, it must be repeated with the engine at normal operating temperature and purged.
The test consists of a five second idling test and a rapid acceleration test from idle to 2500 rpm, or half the maximum engine speed if this is lower.
With the engine idling, observe the tailpipe emissions for five seconds.
While the engine is accelerated quickly from idle to 2500 rpm (or half the maximum engine speed if this is lower),
observe the tailpipe emissions. The vehicle inspector may require an assistant to accelerate the engine. The assistant must be appropriately instructed to avoid engine damage by over-accelerating the engine.
A vehicle will PASS if during both tests:
A vehicle will FAIL if during either test:

Figure 1. Barely visible smoke. This vehicle would pass.

Figure 2. Clearly visible smoke. This vehicle would fail.

Figure 3. Clearly visible smoke. This vehicle would fail.

Figure 4. Clearly visible smoke. This vehicle would fail.

Figure 5. Clearly visible smoke. This vehicle would fail.
Page created: 25 October 2006