Land Transport NZ is now
part of the NZ Transport Agency
www.nzta.govt.nz
Accessibility | Help | Site index | Contact us
Print version: New Zealand walking and cycling strategies (PDF, 2.9 MB)
The vision of this Regional Pedestrian Strategy is “more pedestrians in a convenient, safe and pleasant environment”. Pedestrians are a critical element of the transport system that often form essential links with other modes.
This strategy has been developed with a technical group comprised of representatives from Greater Wellington Regional Council, the regions territorial authorities, Transit New Zealand, the Land Transport Safety Authority (Wellington region), Living Streets Aotearoa (Wellington) and Regional Public Health.
Wellington region is making some gains in pedestrian safety, and casualties are decreasing with increasing usage. However, the safety of the pedestrian environment is not improving to the same extent as the motor vehicle environment. Pedestrian casualties as a proportion of total casualties are increasing. Safety needs to be an integral feature of this strategy with safety improvements integrated to service level provisions and programmes such as Safe Routes to School and Walking School Bus.
There is also a need to move the region toward consistency of pedestrian provisions across RCA boundaries. This requires the identification of appropriate best practice standards. GWRC has a role in coordinating and advocating for this approach. As a region we need to ensure pedestrian requirements are adequately taken into account during planning activities. Ideally TA and GWRC expectations need to be aligned and opportunities for this will stem largely from future plan changes and District Plan reviews. We expect TAs and GWRC to work together closely in these processes.
A wide body of pedestrian statistics is available from varying sources (ACC, LTSA, SPARC, local authorities, regional councils etc). Some information has been drawn together in this strategy to capture the pedestrian profile in the Wellington region. However, clarity is needed regarding the information each agency has at hand and the programmes with which they are involved. Information sharing, facilitated by GWRC, will assist in coordinating pedestrian programmes among agencies.
The objectives for the Regional Pedestrian Strategy are:
The strategy action programme is an integrated package of interventions. GWRC has a clear role in facilitating and monitoring strategy implementation, however the effectiveness of the strategy relies on commitment from all key stakeholders, particularly from RCAs in establishing a pedestrian review programme for their respective roading networks.
For more information, please visit the Toronto City website.
lnitiatives that could be completed within 2 years of adoption of the cycle strategy:
Our vision
The Auckland region is safe, easy and enjoyable to walk in.
What do we want a walking strategy to do?
Walking in the Auckland region needs to be recognised and valued as a mode of transport for all ages. Pedestrians are legitimate road users, their needs and rights in the roading environment need to be well understood, and the use of ‘best practice’, pedestrian supportive urban planning, roading design and transport management methods are required.
What will be the outcomes?
We are seeking by 2015 that Auckland will be a region where:
Our objectives
Objective 1: Recreation
To promote and enhance the opportunities for recreational walking and cycling in Tauranga District.
Objective 2: Accessibility
To make walking and cycling a more viable and convenient way of getting around Tauranga District.
Objective 3: Safety
To improve the safety of walking and cycling in Tauranga Dsitrict.
Objective 4: Funding
To ensure that adequate funds are available to implement the objectives and actions of this strategy.
A set of key principles has been developed to provide guidance for those strategies that include or impact upon cycling but fall outside the influence of this strategy, such as the MCTS, RLTS and NZ Transport Strategy. This hierarchy of solutions may also be used as a practical tool at a locational level in the network plan (for example, when considering developing cycle routes).
The hierarchy of solutions in the following priority order is:
Policy 1 - Provision of a cycle network
To ensure the continued development of a cycle network for Christchurch.
Policy 2 - Provision of cycle routes
To develop cycle routes for Christchurch that:
This updated strategy recognises that enhancing the physical environment is a key method to reduce cycle collisions, increases the number of people who like cycling, and thereby increase the number of cyclists.
A network is a series of routes connecting destinations. Developing this cycling infrastructure can enable cyclists to travel more conveniently, feel more comfortable and safer than without them. The network is planned to cater for existing and increased future growth.
Progress made in meeting the objectives and working towards the vision of this strategy will be measured against the following targets:
CT1
To define a strategic cycle network by June 2004.
CT2
To establish by way of the LTCCP, a percentage of capital investment in new transport infrastructure to be spent on cycling specific schemes.
CT3
To achieve a reduction in the rate of cycling casualties equivalent to over a third by 2012.
CT4
To increase the proportion of commuter trips made by cycle from the estimated 2001 level of 4% to 6% by 2007, and 9% by 2012.
CT5
To increase the proportion of school students who currently cycle to school at an annual rate which enables a total level of 35% to be reached before 2008 and 50% to be reached and maintained before 2012.
CT6
To increase the proportion of the general population who cycle for recreation both on and off the road, at an annual rate which enables a total level of 20% to be reached before 2008 and 35% to be reached and maintained before 2012.
CT7
Strategic cycle network (as defined) to be completed by 2012.
CT8
To ensure the proportion of cyclists who are satisfied with the provision of cycle parking in the CBD, transport interchange points, new developments and recreation areas grows at an annual rate that enables a total level of 70% to be reached and maintained before 2012.
CT9
To ensure the proportion of cyclists who are satisfied with the provision of secure covered bicycle storage and shower/change amenities at the workplace grows at an annual rate which enables a total level of 60% to be reached and maintained before 2012.
It is important that information about the pedestrian environment and pedstrian movements is gathered regularly to give a base for on-going decisions to be made in the area of implementation. Data is also important as a means of analysing changes and trends in provision and perception, which will help to find out the level to which the strategy is being implemented. The indicators listed previously form the basis of the monitoring programme.
Data available
There is a variety of information available related to aspects of the pedestrian environment, however there is a need to develop more data sources for some of the indicators. Some current indicators (types of data collected) include:
What this strategy will do for the people of North Shore City
This strategy aims to outline what we can do to encourage cycling across the city.
Too often we find people really enjoy cycling or clearly indicate they would like to cycle, but cite many (justifiable) reasons why they don't. In this summary we address many of those reasons and hope to show in plain English just what this strategy will do for people on the North Shore.
I don't cycle because it's too dangerous
I don't cycle because it's too hilly
I don't cycle because there's nowhere to park my bike safely
I don't cycle because it's too far
I don't cycle because it's too hot and I sweat a lot
I don't cycle because I'm too old
I don't cycle because I'm not fit enough
I don't cycle because it's always raining
Census data
Trends emerging from data for Central Otago have been analysed and are shown below. The overall trend in Central Otago from Census statistics shows that since 1986, walking and cycling to work have been steadily declining. Combined travel to work by these modes has declined from 28% to 18%. These data are illustrated in Chart 1 below.
Chart 1: Travel to work trends by walk and cycle 1986-2001
Source: Statistics New Zealand
Note: In this graph a communter is someone that travels to work; it does not include those that work from home.
We know that 4968 people travelled to work in Central Otago on Census day in 2001. The Census recorded 873 people who walked or cycled to work, a significant proportion (nearly 18%) of all those who travelled to work. As noted above, however, this figure has fallen from nearly 28% in 1986.
For Central Otago's more urban residents, walking and cycling are more common than for rural residents, as might be expected.
Cycle counts
Bicycle counts were conducted in April 2004 at several key intersections on arterial routes across the city during weekday peak times. The bicycle counts provide a snapshot of the frequency of cyclists on the main arterial routes at selected locations.
The counts were spread over a period of three days and comprise of a snapshot of a ‘typical’ day of bicycle movements across the morning (7-9am) and afternoon-evening periods (3-6pm). The results indicated that the most popular cycle route was via Old Mangere Bridge - an important route for sports and recreational cyclists. Other more popular routes include St George St/Kolmar Road (Papatoetoe) and Great South/East Tamaki Rd - possibly linked with travel to the MIT in Otara.
Figure 3.5 - Data of bicycle traffic counts, April 2004
| Location | 7-9am | 3-6pm | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Old Mangere Bridge | 49 | 52 | 101 |
| Great South Rd/Te Irirangi Dr/Cavendish Dr | 16 | 32 | 48 |
| Great South Rd/Orams/Browns Rd | 16 | 27 | 43 |
| St George Rd/Kolmar Rd | 35 | 37 | 72 |
| Great South Rd/East Tamaki Rd | 37 | 44 | 81 |
| Massey Rd/Buckland Rd | 12 | 26 | 38 |
| East Tamaki/Otara Rd | 22 | 33 | 55 |
| Total | 190 | 257 | 447 |
International comparison
A comparison of Manukau City with selected cities overseas identifies that higher levels of cycling and walking are associated with the following factors:
| Type of facility | Walking responses | Cycling responses |
|---|---|---|
| No dedicated facilities | Approval: 20% | Approval: 30% |
| Road-side footpath 1 | Approval: 76% | Approval: 40% |
| Road-side footpath 2 | Approval: 84% | Approval: 85% |
| Shared off-road facilities for cycling and walking | Approval: 89% | Approval: 90% |
Participants were also invited to add comments on specific services and facilities they would like to see Council provide. The most common facility requested were:
The urban area of Hastings has 415km of footpaths, along 265km of road. The Council is responsible for maintaining all of these existing public footpaths, as well as for ensuring that new footpaths are constructed to appropriate standards.
The Council's Road and Traffic Engineering Standards specify road reserve and carriageway criteria. Local streets with less than 200 vehicles per day, or 25 houses, are only required to have a single footpath. All other urban roads require two footpaths. There are no specific requirements for minimum footpath widths, but reference is made to the Austroads Guide to Traffic Engineering Practice, Part 13 Pedestrians and the New Zealand Standard 4121: Code of Practice for Design and Access for Disabled persons.
About half of all footpaths in Hastings are 1.5m in width, and about a third are narrower than 1.5m. Around 10% or 40km of existing footpaths are narrower than the nationally recommended minimum width of 1.2m.
A clear width of 1.5m allows a wheelchair and a pram to pass each other, and 1.8m is required for two wheelchairs to pass comfortably.
While pedestrian crossings aid walkers to cross the road safely, too many crossings reduce their effectiveness as drivers lose their respect for them. Compliance with recognised pedestrian crossing warrants is therefore important in not only providing for pedestrians but also providing for their safety.
Not all pedestrians have full visibility, and many blind and visually impaired pedestrians need extra assistance to enable them to walk safely. Approximately 3% of the population is blind or vision-impaired. They are unable to drive vehicles, so they rely on walking as their independent mode of transport. To provide for these users, footpaths should be constructed with reference to the recognised RTS14 document Guidelines for Facilities for Blind and Vision-Impaired Pedestrians.
It should be remembered that there can be a number of other uses of footpath space. These include street signs, parking meters, cafes and seating, shop displays, and street furniture. The minimum widths need to be widened to allow for these. Footpaths can also provide space for wheelchair users, pushchairs, young cyclists and runners.
Cyclists' needs
Davies (1996, pp.9-10) states: “Providing cycling facilities should not be an objective in itself. Cyclists do not want cycle facilities per se. They want routes that are fit for cycling . . . With the increase in traffic volumes and speeds, many roads have become less attractive for cycling; and the design of new roads has often ignored the needs of cyclists. However there is little prospect of constructing a totally separate cycle route network that . . . avoids all existing roads. Planning for cycling must therefore start from the premise that, whatever special facilities are provided, the [urban roading] network should be made as convenient and as safe as possible for cyclists.”
Davies (1996, p.10) recommends that the following hierarchy of measures be considered before a design solution is chosen for any particular section of road or urban area:
These measures are not mutually exclusive. Measures higher up the hierarchy [(1) or (2)] will help ensure that lower measures will either be successful or be unnecessary.
Case studies cited in Mathew (1995, p.57) show that bicycles account for between 14 and 43 percent of all trips in the centre of some European cities. The high cycle usage has been achieved as a result of combinations of traffic restraint measures, traffic calming, parking reduction and the development of cycle networks.
Cycle route network planning
“In order to plan in a rational and comprehensive way, and to integrate measures to assist cyclists with other transport or planning developments, it is important to identify a cycle network. Network planning is not intended to imply that cyclists should be restricted to a limited set of routes, but it is a tool to help set priorities and to ensure route continuity.” (Davies, 1996, p.12)
Designing for pedestrians and cyclists should not take place as an ancillary activity to designing for motor vehicles. Safe pedestrian and cyclist friendly environments take heed of the principles detailed below.
Page created: 7 October 2008